Not a practical comparison as African elephant’s are a protected buy international law ,so we probably can’t get hold of one, which i believe is good enough reason to get it .
Why don’t the institute of making want the microscope any more? Suggests it’s less than useful? Or they used it so much they’ve bought an up-to-date one.
You may well all be nuts, but I’m not qualified to make any medical diagnoses.
But I do think this needs a bit more consideration before bringing what looks like an incredibly hefty piece of equipment into the space.
Such as: what do we need it for, and could we fulfil that need in some other (more compact?) way?
Where would it live in the space?
How heavy/voluminous is it?
Does it serve the Makerspace to have this?
Fun and cool should be part of a ‘points system’, but a system weighted towards usefulness/practicality.
The pledge drive is a useful tool to compare here: what would you be willing to pay for such a scope? (although a pledge drive seems to run the risk of imposing tools that a small group wants simply because a few people find the money?)
Slms is full of scientists , so why not . Its not the sort of microscope i have used for electronics but it will be useful if anyone is using fibreoptics