You don’t need to have a darkroom at all to do most of the practices that would work in the space. In my professional experience attempting to set up a working darkroom especially with an enlarger is not viable in the space.
I like to think about it this way:
All the spaces that are within the makers space give the user the ability to make the highest quality of final results given enough skill of the user. That’s why so many people come to the space to invest time in making and developing skill.
A darkroom on the other hand is not just dependant on skill, it is highly dependent on environment. There will be no consistency in any traditional darkroom printing due to the environmental conditions. All that and then you still wouldn’t put an earthquake detector under a train line.
This all being said I am more than willing to be proven wrong. If the consensus is to go head with this, then please, please consult as many people you can in the space that have as many specialties in photographic printing as possible and make a full cross checked plan beforehand. This would be something to raise in a members meeting.
This isn’t just about quality of printing it is also about the health and safety of all the members and the environment. How could you run a viable induction instead that area. Also consider what it would be like to induct people one at a time in cupboard.