I have many many thoughts about the minutes from the directors meeting, that I don’t have time to expand on right now. I’m heading to see my sister who has just this very hour bought forth new offspring. Life as usual, takes absolute priority.
Can I just point out though as I’m irked right this second, substituting “Trustee” for “Director” has the exact opposite effect to the relatively well thought out intention of this policy. I note this, mostly because I have seen all of the rules and regulations updated over the course of the morning to this new nomenclature. Also, I fail to see how hierarchy is not imposed when most of those rules and regulations start with “get permission from a director”
That’s all for now. I’m not checking in for a few days, whilst the head of my infant niece is successfully wetted.
This is perhaps a confusion, it’s not substituting, but removing the term trustee, we were always company directors, this isn’t a Charity or CIC, the term was attempting to ape London Hackspace, et al.
This is precisely the problem the new governance should be aiming to resolve, however if we Command-Z those changes, and put the word trustee the rules are still the same.
The change of the word only has an (intentional) affect of changing the perception of who this group of three people, soon to be two are.